Brukersamtale:Dena Utne - Sideversjonshistorikk

Siri J: /* Follo */ ny seksjon

2011-05-13T13:18:10Z

Follo: ny seksjon

← Eldre sideversjon		Sideversjonen fra 13. mai 2011 kl. 13:18
Linje 99:		Linje 99:
	Hi Dena, it might be a good idea to let Olve or me change your status into a robot when you are doing a lot of edits. That way we don't flood the recent changes-page (I do it to myself from time to time when I e.g. change categories for a lot of pages) it's easier for the "normal" users this way ;) And your edits are still visible, if you only turn on "vis roboter" at the recent changes page ;) Wishing you all a good week - cheers ;) [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]] 31. mai 2010 kl. 17:43 (CEST)		Hi Dena, it might be a good idea to let Olve or me change your status into a robot when you are doing a lot of edits. That way we don't flood the recent changes-page (I do it to myself from time to time when I e.g. change categories for a lot of pages) it's easier for the "normal" users this way ;) And your edits are still visible, if you only turn on "vis roboter" at the recent changes page ;) Wishing you all a good week - cheers ;) [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]] 31. mai 2010 kl. 17:43 (CEST)
	:Resistance is futile! I will be assimilated! ;-) [[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 31. mai 2010 kl. 20:41 (CEST)		:Resistance is futile! I will be assimilated! ;-) [[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 31. mai 2010 kl. 20:41 (CEST)

			== Follo ==

			Hei Dena - jeg slettet nettopp kategorien «Kristendom i Follo kommune» fordi Follo ikke er en kommune men en region. Mvh [[brukersamtale:Siri J\|Siri J]] 13. mai 2011 kl. 15:18 (CEST)

Siri J: subster

2010-06-11T09:26:53Z

subster

@@ Linje 1: / Linje 1: @@
 {{Velkommen}}
 Hei Dena!
 Hyggelig å se at du har registrert deg! Håper du finner deg greit til rette, og at du etter hvert finner ut av hvordan ting er organisert her på wikien. Det er bare å ta kontakt via brukersider, mail eller telefon når det er noe du lurer på. :) <br />

Dena Utne på 31. mai 2010 kl. 18:41

2010-05-31T18:41:00Z

← Eldre sideversjon		Sideversjonen fra 31. mai 2010 kl. 18:41
Linje 85:		Linje 85:

	Hi Dena, it might be a good idea to let Olve or me change your status into a robot when you are doing a lot of edits. That way we don't flood the recent changes-page (I do it to myself from time to time when I e.g. change categories for a lot of pages) it's easier for the "normal" users this way ;) And your edits are still visible, if you only turn on "vis roboter" at the recent changes page ;) Wishing you all a good week - cheers ;) [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]] 31. mai 2010 kl. 17:43 (CEST)		Hi Dena, it might be a good idea to let Olve or me change your status into a robot when you are doing a lot of edits. That way we don't flood the recent changes-page (I do it to myself from time to time when I e.g. change categories for a lot of pages) it's easier for the "normal" users this way ;) And your edits are still visible, if you only turn on "vis roboter" at the recent changes page ;) Wishing you all a good week - cheers ;) [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]] 31. mai 2010 kl. 17:43 (CEST)
			:Resistance is futile! I will be assimilated! ;-) [[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 31. mai 2010 kl. 20:41 (CEST)

Siri J: /* Cloaking? */ ny seksjon

2010-05-31T15:43:59Z

Cloaking?: ny seksjon

← Eldre sideversjon		Sideversjonen fra 31. mai 2010 kl. 15:43
Linje 81:		Linje 81:

	Use of categorymatch should be avoided, but when the system was designed people run a little to fast and the system became stuck with to much use of categorymatch. It is possible to run some analysis to detect where it breaks down, but it is a lot of places. Mostly it happens because naming of categories isn't predictable. A more general solution is to use a more advanced rewrite engine for category names, but this doesn't work well with the present portals. There were two rewrites of the portal system, both are deleted I believe. A third rewrite was never completed, but was a lot better because it has its own rewrite engine and does not depend on special formatting. — ''[[Bruker:Jeblad\|Jeblad]]'' 24. mai 2010 kl. 22:14 (CEST)		Use of categorymatch should be avoided, but when the system was designed people run a little to fast and the system became stuck with to much use of categorymatch. It is possible to run some analysis to detect where it breaks down, but it is a lot of places. Mostly it happens because naming of categories isn't predictable. A more general solution is to use a more advanced rewrite engine for category names, but this doesn't work well with the present portals. There were two rewrites of the portal system, both are deleted I believe. A third rewrite was never completed, but was a lot better because it has its own rewrite engine and does not depend on special formatting. — ''[[Bruker:Jeblad\|Jeblad]]'' 24. mai 2010 kl. 22:14 (CEST)

			== Cloaking? ==

			Hi Dena, it might be a good idea to let Olve or me change your status into a robot when you are doing a lot of edits. That way we don't flood the recent changes-page (I do it to myself from time to time when I e.g. change categories for a lot of pages) it's easier for the "normal" users this way ;) And your edits are still visible, if you only turn on "vis roboter" at the recent changes page ;) Wishing you all a good week - cheers ;) [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]] 31. mai 2010 kl. 17:43 (CEST)

Dena Utne: /* Categories and other fixes */

2010-05-24T22:20:34Z

Categories and other fixes

← Eldre sideversjon		Sideversjonen fra 24. mai 2010 kl. 22:20
Linje 69:		Linje 69:

	::::[[Forside:Våle kommune]] seems to be causing a bunch of mysterious problems for no explicable reasons. My current hypothesis is that we have a computer bug. I have deleted the page and re-created it,and we'll see if it holds up better.		::::[[Forside:Våle kommune]] seems to be causing a bunch of mysterious problems for no explicable reasons. My current hypothesis is that we have a computer bug. I have deleted the page and re-created it,and we'll see if it holds up better.

			The pages that are doing weird things just need to be deleted and re-instated with the same coding that is delted. There is some sort of bug happening when pages are moved ... I think the <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki> isn't updating after the move. [[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 25. mai 2010 kl. 00:20 (CEST)

	== Forside:Setesdal is missing ==		== Forside:Setesdal is missing ==

Jeblad: /* Categorymatch */ ny seksjon

2010-05-24T20:14:05Z

Categorymatch: ny seksjon

← Eldre sideversjon		Sideversjonen fra 24. mai 2010 kl. 20:14
Linje 75:		Linje 75:

	:Hei. The Agders have been on hold until I get a list of districts. [[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 23. mai 2010 kl. 18:50 (CEST)		:Hei. The Agders have been on hold until I get a list of districts. [[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 23. mai 2010 kl. 18:50 (CEST)

			== Categorymatch ==

			Use of categorymatch should be avoided, but when the system was designed people run a little to fast and the system became stuck with to much use of categorymatch. It is possible to run some analysis to detect where it breaks down, but it is a lot of places. Mostly it happens because naming of categories isn't predictable. A more general solution is to use a more advanced rewrite engine for category names, but this doesn't work well with the present portals. There were two rewrites of the portal system, both are deleted I believe. A third rewrite was never completed, but was a lot better because it has its own rewrite engine and does not depend on special formatting. — ''[[Bruker:Jeblad\|Jeblad]]'' 24. mai 2010 kl. 22:14 (CEST)

Jeblad: /* Categorymatches for Various Places */

2010-05-24T20:06:20Z

Categorymatches for Various Places

← Eldre sideversjon		Sideversjonen fra 24. mai 2010 kl. 20:06
Linje 36:		Linje 36:
	Hi again! I know I didn't answer your question - will do right after this one for you: Can you please take a look at [http://www.lokalhistoriewiki.no/index.php?title=Forside:V%C3%A5le_kommune&action=edit this forside] and find out why there's a categorymatch for Børge Evensen (one of our users) being called from here? AFAIK he's not even from that part of the country :) [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]] 24. apr 2010 kl. 13:40 (CEST)		Hi again! I know I didn't answer your question - will do right after this one for you: Can you please take a look at [http://www.lokalhistoriewiki.no/index.php?title=Forside:V%C3%A5le_kommune&action=edit this forside] and find out why there's a categorymatch for Børge Evensen (one of our users) being called from here? AFAIK he's not even from that part of the country :) [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]] 24. apr 2010 kl. 13:40 (CEST)
	:No idea why that would be happening. I can look again when it's not 0230, but I don't know that I can figure this one out. [[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 25. apr 2010 kl. 02:26 (CEST)		:No idea why that would be happening. I can look again when it's not 0230, but I don't know that I can figure this one out. [[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 25. apr 2010 kl. 02:26 (CEST)

			Våler, Vang, Sande, Nes. Blant de gamle kommunene finnes det flere. — ''[[Bruker:Jeblad\|Jeblad]]'' 24. mai 2010 kl. 22:06 (CEST)

	== Up for deletion? ==		== Up for deletion? ==

Dena Utne: /* Forside:Setesdal is missing */

2010-05-23T16:50:13Z

Forside:Setesdal is missing

← Eldre sideversjon		Sideversjonen fra 23. mai 2010 kl. 16:50
Linje 71:		Linje 71:

	Hi Dena, just got a question from a mate living there, why we don't have a forside for this area. I couldn't find one, so instead of making one, I thought I'd ask you... [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]]		Hi Dena, just got a question from a mate living there, why we don't have a forside for this area. I couldn't find one, so instead of making one, I thought I'd ask you... [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]]

			:Hei. The Agders have been on hold until I get a list of districts. [[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 23. mai 2010 kl. 18:50 (CEST)

Siri J: /* Forside:Setesdal is missing */ ny seksjon

2010-05-23T13:15:25Z

Forside:Setesdal is missing: ny seksjon

← Eldre sideversjon		Sideversjonen fra 23. mai 2010 kl. 13:15
Linje 67:		Linje 67:

	::::[[Forside:Våle kommune]] seems to be causing a bunch of mysterious problems for no explicable reasons. My current hypothesis is that we have a computer bug. I have deleted the page and re-created it,and we'll see if it holds up better.		::::[[Forside:Våle kommune]] seems to be causing a bunch of mysterious problems for no explicable reasons. My current hypothesis is that we have a computer bug. I have deleted the page and re-created it,and we'll see if it holds up better.

			== Forside:Setesdal is missing ==

			Hi Dena, just got a question from a mate living there, why we don't have a forside for this area. I couldn't find one, so instead of making one, I thought I'd ask you... [[brukerdiskusjon:Siri J\|Siri J]]

Dena Utne: /* Categories and other fixes */

2010-05-21T13:20:54Z

Categories and other fixes

← Eldre sideversjon		Sideversjonen fra 21. mai 2010 kl. 13:20
Linje 52:		Linje 52:
	:Hi Siri.		:Hi Siri.

	I am not sure what you want me to do with Kategori:Sandøy since it doesn't exist.		:I am not sure what you want me to do with Kategori:Sandøy since it doesn't exist.

	I fixed the double redirects. Thanks for letting me know about them. I will try to check the double-redirects list regularly when I am editing. I don't think it has been an issue before unless you or someone else has been cleaning up after me.		:I fixed the double redirects. Thanks for letting me know about them. I will try to check the double-redirects list regularly when I am editing. I don't think it has been an issue before unless you or someone else has been cleaning up after me.

	As for [[Forside:Våle kommune]] getting the category «Categorymatch for Øystre Slidre kommune», I have no idea why that would be happening. It is a mystery. The [[Mal:Categorymatch for Våle kommune]] looks fine. Can you show me where you are finding evidence of this so I can have a look there into this mystery.		:As for [[Forside:Våle kommune]] getting the category «Categorymatch for Øystre Slidre kommune», I have no idea why that would be happening. It is a mystery. The [[Mal:Categorymatch for Våle kommune]] looks fine. Can you show me where you are finding evidence of this so I can have a look there into this mystery.

	BTW, I realize that the navigation templates in Trøndelag still need a bit of work. There are one or two forsider that are not displaying everything yet. I am not finished there.		:BTW, I realize that the navigation templates in Trøndelag still need a bit of work. There are one or two forsider that are not displaying everything yet. I am not finished there.

	[[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 21. mai 2010 kl. 08:26 (CEST)		:[[Bruker:Dena Utne\|Dena Utne]] 21. mai 2010 kl. 08:26 (CEST)

	::Somehow the non-existing categories are getting called from within the templates. I've looked, but haven't got the foggiest as to why it's happening. They keep on popping up on [http://www.lokalhistoriewiki.no/index.php?title=Spesial:%C3%98nskede_kategorier&limit=500&offset=0 this] maintenance page. If you look at the frontpages I've mentioned above, like [http://www.lokalhistoriewiki.no/index.php?title=Kategori:Surnadal&action=edit&redlink=1 Surnadal], you'll see that they invoke a non-existing category without 'kommune' in the name.		::Somehow the non-existing categories are getting called from within the templates. I've looked, but haven't got the foggiest as to why it's happening. They keep on popping up on [http://www.lokalhistoriewiki.no/index.php?title=Spesial:%C3%98nskede_kategorier&limit=500&offset=0 this] maintenance page. If you look at the frontpages I've mentioned above, like [http://www.lokalhistoriewiki.no/index.php?title=Kategori:Surnadal&action=edit&redlink=1 Surnadal], you'll see that they invoke a non-existing category without 'kommune' in the name.